Panorama Panel vs LEO by Leger

Panorama Panel excels in customer service, providing multiple support channels like a detailed FAQ and dedicated live technical assistance.

Their team is particularly focused on ensuring a smooth onboarding experience, helping participants through device setup and streaming service connections.

Users praise the support team's responsiveness and patience, whether dealing with initial setup questions or resolving ongoing measurement issues.

LEO provides customer support through their website contact form, email system, and FAQ section covering common questions. The support experience varies significantly - some users report quick responses while others wait several weeks and require multiple follow-up messages.

Response times range from same-day replies to multiple weeks for typical inquiries about missing survey points, payment delays, or technical difficulties. The inconsistent support quality represents one of LEO's main weaknesses, with users often experiencing frustration when needing personalized assistance.

The main challenge with Panorama Panel is the initial waiting period. New users must complete the full setup process, wait through the 45-day grace period, and maintain consistent participation.

While this might seem lengthy, it's a standard practice in research panels to ensure data quality. Once you're past this initial period, the monthly rewards are reliable and consistent.

The $20 minimum cash-out requirement is considerably higher than many competing survey sites, which often allow redemptions starting at $5-$10. Many users report frustratingly long gaps between survey invitations, with some receiving only 4-5 surveys over several months.

Support response times are highly unpredictable, ranging from same-day responses to weeks of silence requiring multiple follow-up messages. The redemption system only allows specific predetermined amounts rather than custom cash-out values, and the platform is restricted to US and Canadian residents only.